Nevada voters in the upcoming election will have more than just candidates to choose from. There are seven ballot questions that could potentially bring about significant changes to state laws. Let’s take a closer look at each question, what they propose, and the arguments from both supporters and opponents.
Question 1 addresses the Nevada Board of Regents. If passed, it would remove the constitutional status of the board, which oversees Nevada’s universities. This would allow for legislative oversight through audits. Supporters believe this change would bring much-needed accountability to the board, while opponents argue that it would not solve the underlying issues in higher education.
Question 2 deals with updating disability-related language in the Nevada constitution. The proposal aims to replace outdated terms with more modern language. While supporters see this as a necessary step to provide better care for those with special needs, opponents argue that changes to the constitution should be rare and that language should reflect historical context.
Question 3 focuses on ranked-choice voting and open primaries. This measure would replace the closed-primary system with nonpartisan open primaries and ranked-choice voting for certain elections. Supporters believe this would allow for more moderate candidates, but opponents fear confusion and increased costs.
Question 4 seeks to remove language in the Nevada Constitution that allows for the use of slavery as a criminal punishment. Supporters find the current language offensive and unnecessary, while opponents worry about unintended consequences within the criminal justice system.
Question 5 aims to make child and adult diapers exempt from sales tax. Supporters argue that this would provide relief to families facing high costs, while opponents are concerned about the impact on state and local tax revenues.
Question 6 looks to codify abortion rights in the Nevada Constitution. Supporters see this as a way to permanently protect abortion rights, while opponents argue that current laws already provide protection and that the measure could create uncertainties.
Question 7 addresses voter ID requirements. If passed, voters would need to show acceptable identification to vote in person or provide verification for mail-in ballots. Supporters believe this would improve election security, while opponents argue that it could disenfranchise voters who lack access to IDs.
These ballot questions cover a range of important issues facing Nevada voters. It is essential for voters to understand the implications of each question and make an informed decision at the polls.
